| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB6496CE5A0DA25D7AF9FD666492770@VE1PR04MB6496.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:19:43 +0000
From: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"vinicius.gomes@...el.com" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next, 1/2] enetc: Configure the Time-Aware
Scheduler via tc-taprio offload
Br,
Po Liu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
> Sent: 2019年11月12日 17:41
> To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>; davem@...emloft.net; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; vinicius.gomes@...el.com;
> Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>; Alexandru Marginean
> <alexandru.marginean@....com>; Xiaoliang Yang
> <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>; Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>; Mingkai Hu
> <mingkai.hu@....com>; Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@....com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [net-next, 1/2] enetc: Configure the Time-Aware Scheduler via
> tc-taprio offload
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:41:26AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
> > ENETC supports in hardware for time-based egress shaping according to
> > IEEE 802.1Qbv. This patch implement the Qbv enablement by the hardware
> > offload method qdisc tc-taprio method.
> > Also update cbdr writeback to up level since control bd ring may
> > writeback data to control bd ring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
> > Singed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 19 ++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 2 +
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c | 5 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 150 ++++++++++++++++--
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 130 +++++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > index d200c27c3bf6..389f722efc43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ common-objs := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
> > enetc_mdio.o $(common-objs)
> > fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> > +fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_NET_SCH_TAPRIO) += enetc_qos.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_VF) += fsl-enetc-vf.o fsl-enetc-vf-y :=
> > enetc_vf.o $(common-objs) diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index 3e8f9819f08c..d58dbc2c4270 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -1427,8 +1427,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> > - void *type_data)
> > +int enetc_setup_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> > {
> > struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > struct tc_mqprio_qopt *mqprio = type_data; @@ -1436,9 +1435,6 @@
> > int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> > u8 num_tc;
> > int i;
> >
> > - if (type != TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO)
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -
> > mqprio->hw = TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_TCS;
> > num_tc = mqprio->num_tc;
> >
> > @@ -1483,6 +1479,19 @@ int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev,
> enum tc_setup_type type,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> > + void *type_data)
> > +{
> > + switch (type) {
> > + case TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO:
> > + return enetc_setup_tc_mqprio(ndev, type_data);
> > + case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
> > + return enetc_setup_tc_taprio(ndev, type_data);
> > + default:
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > struct net_device_stats *enetc_get_stats(struct net_device *ndev) {
> > struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > index 541b4e2073fe..8676631041d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > @@ -244,3 +244,5 @@ int enetc_set_fs_entry(struct enetc_si *si, struct
> > enetc_cmd_rfse *rfse, void enetc_set_rss_key(struct enetc_hw *hw,
> > const u8 *bytes); int enetc_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32
> > *table, int count); int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si,
> > const u32 *table, int count);
> > +int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd); int
> > +enetc_setup_tc_taprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > index de466b71bf8f..201cbc362e33 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int enetc_cbd_unused(struct enetc_cbdr *r)
> > r->bd_count;
> > }
> >
> > -static int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> > +int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> > {
> > struct enetc_cbdr *ring = &si->cbd_ring;
> > int timeout = ENETC_CBDR_TIMEOUT; @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ static int
> > enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> > if (!timeout)
> > return -EBUSY;
> >
> > + /* CBD may writeback data, feedback up level */
> > + *cbd = *dest_cbd;
> > +
> > enetc_clean_cbdr(si);
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > index 88276299f447..75a7c0f1f8ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #define ENETC_SICTR0 0x18
> > #define ENETC_SICTR1 0x1c
> > #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0 0x20
> > +#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV BIT(4)
> > #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RSS BIT(8)
> > #define ENETC_SIPCAPR1 0x24
> > #define ENETC_SITGTGR 0x30
> > @@ -148,6 +149,12 @@ enum enetc_bdr_type {TX, RX};
> > #define ENETC_PORT_BASE 0x10000
> > #define ENETC_PMR 0x0000
> > #define ENETC_PMR_EN GENMASK(18, 16)
> > +#define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) #define
> > +ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_10M 0x000 #define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_100M
> 0x100
> > +#define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_1000M 0x200 #define
> ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_2500M
> > +0x400
>
> Perhaps BIT() is appropriate here.
Will change to BIT().
>
> The changes above to enetc_hw.h are not used until the following patch,
> perhaps it would be better if they were part of that patch.
>
Yes, better to move to patch 2/2.
> > +
> > #define ENETC_PSR 0x0004 /* RO */
> > #define ENETC_PSIPMR 0x0018
> > #define ENETC_PSIPMR_SET_UP(n) BIT(n) /* n = SI index */
> > @@ -440,22 +447,6 @@ union enetc_rx_bd {
> > #define EMETC_MAC_ADDR_FILT_RES 3 /* # of reserved entries at the
> beginning */
> > #define ENETC_MAX_NUM_VFS 2
> >
> > -struct enetc_cbd {
> > - union {
> > - struct {
> > - __le32 addr[2];
> > - __le32 opt[4];
> > - };
> > - __le32 data[6];
> > - };
> > - __le16 index;
> > - __le16 length;
> > - u8 cmd;
> > - u8 cls;
> > - u8 _res;
> > - u8 status_flags;
> > -};
> > -
> > #define ENETC_CBD_FLAGS_SF BIT(7) /* short format */
> > #define ENETC_CBD_STATUS_MASK 0xf
> >
> > @@ -554,3 +545,130 @@ static inline void enetc_set_bdr_prio(struct
> enetc_hw *hw, int bdr_idx,
> > val |= ENETC_TBMR_SET_PRIO(prio);
> > enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, bdr_idx, ENETC_TBMR, val); }
> > +
> > +enum bdcr_cmd_class {
> > + BDCR_CMD_UNSPEC = 0,
> > + BDCR_CMD_MAC_FILTER,
> > + BDCR_CMD_VLAN_FILTER,
> > + BDCR_CMD_RSS,
> > + BDCR_CMD_RFS,
> > + BDCR_CMD_PORT_GCL,
> > + BDCR_CMD_RECV_CLASSIFIER,
> > + __BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN,
> > + BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN = __BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN - 1, };
> > +
> > +/* class 5, command 0 */
> > +struct tgs_gcl_conf {
> > + u8 atc; /* init gate value */
> > + u8 res[7];
> > + union {
> > + struct {
> > + u8 res1[4];
> > + __le16 acl_len;
>
> Given that u* types are used in this structure I think le16 would be more
> appropriate than __le16.
Here keep the same code style of this .h file. I think it is better to have another patch to fix them all. Do you agree?
>
> > + u8 res2[2];
> > + };
> > + struct {
> > + u32 cctl;
> > + u32 ccth;
> > + };
>
> I'm a little surprised to see host endian values in a structure that appears to be
> written to hardware. Is this intentional?
Will remove.
>
> Also, these fields do not seem to be used in this patch-set.
> Is that also intentional?
This is defined hardware writeback value, can be remove temporary.
>
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IOMEN BIT(0)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IPVEN BIT(3)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_GTST BIT(4)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IPV_MASK 0xe
>
> Perhaps GENMASK() is appropriate here and elsewhere for generating masks.
>
Will remove these define in this patch.
> > +
> > +/* gate control list entry */
> > +struct gce {
> > + u32 period;
>
> Likewise, I'm a little surprised to see host-byte order data to be written to HW.
> And below too. Though as I've noted below, some of these values are used to
> store le32 data, so it seems that the types are incorrect
Ok. change to le32.
>
> > + u8 gate;
> > + u8 res[3];
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* tgs_gcl_conf address point to this data space */ struct
> > +tgs_gcl_data {
> > + u32 btl;
> > + u32 bth;
> > + u32 ct;
> > + u32 cte;
> > +};
> > +
Ok. change to le32.
> > +/* class 5, command 1 */
> > +struct tgs_gcl_query {
> > + u8 res[12];
> > + union {
> > + struct {
> > + __le16 acl_len; /* admin list length */
> > + __le16 ocl_len; /* operation list length */
> > + };
> > + struct {
> > + u16 admin_list_len;
> > + u16 oper_list_len;
>
> Again, is it intentional that these are a) host-byte order and
> b) unused?
Ok. Can be remove temporary.
>
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* tgs_gcl_query command response data format */ struct tgs_gcl_resp
> > +{
> > + u32 abtl; /* base time */
> > + u32 abth;
> > + u32 act; /* cycle time */
> > + u32 acte; /* cycle time extend */
> > + u32 cctl; /* config change time */
> > + u32 ccth;
> > + u32 obtl; /* operation base time */
> > + u32 obth;
> > + u32 oct; /* operation cycle time */
> > + u32 octe; /* operation cycle time extend */
> > + u32 ccel; /* config change error */
> > + u32 cceh;
> > +};
>
> This structure seems unused in this patchset.
Will remove.
>
> > +
> > +struct enetc_cbd {
> > + union{
> > + struct {
> > + __le32 addr[2];
> > + union {
> > + __le32 opt[4];
> > + struct tgs_gcl_conf gcl_conf;
> > + struct tgs_gcl_query gcl_query;
> > + };
> > + }; /* Long format */
> > + __le32 data[6];
> > + };
> > + __le16 index;
> > + __le16 length;
> > + u8 cmd;
> > + u8 cls;
> > + u8 _res;
> > + u8 status_flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_PTCFPR(n) (0x1910 + (n) * 4) /* n = [0 ..7] */
> > +#define ENETC_FPE BIT(31)
> > +
> > +/* Port capability register 0 */
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_PSFPM BIT(10)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_PSFP BIT(9)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_TSN BIT(4)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_QBU BIT(3)
> > +
> > +/* port time gating control register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET 0x11a00
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGE 0x80000000
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGPE BIT(30)
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGDROP_DISABLE BIT(29)
> > +
> > +/* Port time gating capability register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGCAPR_OFFSET 0x11a08
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_MAX_GCL_LEN_MASK 0xffff
> > +
> > +/* Port time gating admin gate list status register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGAGLSR_OFFSET 0x11a10
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_CFG_PEND_MASK 0x00000002
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_TGLSTR 0xa200
> > +#define ENETC_TGS_MIN_DIS_MASK 0x80000000
> > +#define ENETC_MIN_LOOKAHEAD_MASK 0xffff
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..036bb39c7a0b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
> > +/* Copyright 2019 NXP */
> > +
> > +#include "enetc.h"
> > +
> > +#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> > +
> > +static u16 enetc_get_max_gcl_len(struct enetc_hw *hw) {
> > + return enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_QBV_PTGCAPR_OFFSET)
> > + & ENETC_QBV_MAX_GCL_LEN_MASK; }
> > +
> > +static int enetc_setup_taprio(struct net_device *ndev,
> > + struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *admin_conf)
> > +{
> > + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct enetc_cbd cbd = {.cmd = 0};
> > + struct tgs_gcl_conf *gcl_config;
> > + struct tgs_gcl_data *gcl_data;
> > + struct gce *gce;
> > + dma_addr_t dma;
> > + u16 data_size;
> > + u16 gcl_len;
> > + u32 temp;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + gcl_len = admin_conf->num_entries;
> > + if (gcl_len > enetc_get_max_gcl_len(&priv->si->hw))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (admin_conf->enable) {
> > + enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > + ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > + temp & (~ENETC_QBV_TGE));
>
> The enetc_wr() call seems to be common to both arms of the condition.
> If so perhaps it could be move outside of the condition.
Ok. will move it down after the if condition.
>
> > + usleep_range(10, 20);
> > + enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > + ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > + temp | ENETC_QBV_TGE);
> > + } else {
> > + enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > + ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > + temp & (~ENETC_QBV_TGE));
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Configure the (administrative) gate control list using the
> > + * control BD descriptor.
> > + */
> > + gcl_config = &cbd.gcl_conf;
> > +
> > + data_size = sizeof(struct tgs_gcl_data) + gcl_len *
> > + sizeof(struct gce);
>
> I think struct_size() can be used here.
Ok.
>
> > +
> > + gcl_data = kzalloc(data_size, __GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!gcl_data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + gce = (struct gce *)(gcl_data + 1);
> > +
> > + /* Since no initial state config in taprio, set gates open as default.
> > + */
> > + gcl_config->atc = 0xff;
> > + gcl_config->acl_len = cpu_to_le16(gcl_len);
> > +
> > + if (!admin_conf->base_time) {
> > + gcl_data->btl =
> > + cpu_to_le32(enetc_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC_SICTR0));
> > + gcl_data->bth =
> > + cpu_to_le32(enetc_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC_SICTR1));
> > + } else {
> > + gcl_data->btl =
> > + cpu_to_le32(lower_32_bits(admin_conf->base_time));
> > + gcl_data->bth =
> > + cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(admin_conf->base_time));
> > + }
>
> It looks like the types of the btl and bth fields are u32.
> Perhaps they should be le32?
Ok. should be le32.
>
> Please consider running sparse over this code to check for any endian problems.
>
> > +
> > + gcl_data->ct = cpu_to_le32(admin_conf->cycle_time);
> > + gcl_data->cte = cpu_to_le32(admin_conf->cycle_time_extension);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < gcl_len; i++) {
> > + struct tc_taprio_sched_entry *temp_entry;
> > + struct gce *temp_gce = gce + i;
> > +
> > + temp_entry = &admin_conf->entries[i];
> > +
> > + temp_gce->gate = cpu_to_le32(temp_entry->gate_mask);
>
> Gate is a u8 followed by 3 reserved bytes.
> Perhaps there needs to be some bounds checking on
> the value stored there given that the source is 32bits wide.
>
> Also, its not clear to me that the above logic, which I assume
> takes the last significant byte of a 32bit value, works on
> big endian systems as the 32bit value is always little endian.
temp_entry->gate_mask is 32bit for wide possible input. Here change to hardware set 8bit wide.
Can it just be like:
temp_gce->gate = (u8) temp_entry->gate_mask;
>
> > + temp_gce->period = cpu_to_le32(temp_entry->interval);
>
> It looks like the types of the gate field is u32.
> Perhaps it should be le32?
Ok. should be le32.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + cbd.length = cpu_to_le16(data_size);
> > + cbd.status_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + dma = dma_map_single(&priv->si->pdev->dev, gcl_data,
> > + data_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > + if (dma_mapping_error(&priv->si->pdev->dev, dma)) {
> > + netdev_err(priv->si->ndev, "DMA mapping failed!\n");
> > + kfree(gcl_data);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + cbd.addr[0] = lower_32_bits(dma);
> > + cbd.addr[1] = upper_32_bits(dma);
> > + cbd.cls = BDCR_CMD_PORT_GCL;
> > +
> > + /* Updated by ENETC on completion of the configuration
> > + * command. A zero value indicates success.
> > + */
> > + cbd.status_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + enetc_send_cmd(priv->si, &cbd);
> > +
> > + dma_unmap_single(&priv->si->pdev->dev, dma, data_size,
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > + kfree(gcl_data);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int enetc_setup_tc_taprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data) {
> > + struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *taprio = type_data;
> > + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> > + enetc_set_bdr_prio(&priv->si->hw,
> > + priv->tx_ring[i]->index,
> > + taprio->enable ? i : 0);
> > +
> > + return enetc_setup_taprio(ndev, taprio); }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists