linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add support for Layerscape external interrupt lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:44:42 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add support for Layerscape external interrupt
 lines

On 12/11/2019 11.58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2019-11-12 11:27, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 11/11/2019 11.24, Marc Zyngier wrote:

>>> Applied to irqchip-next.
>>
>> Thanks! Can I assume that branch doesn't get rebased so 87cd38dfd9e6 is
>> a stable SHA1? I want to send a patch adding the node to ls1021a.dtsi,
>> and I hope not to have to wait another release cycle.
> 
> I usually try to avoid rebasing it, unless something really bad shows up.
> 
> Now, just adding a node to a DT shouldn't break anything, right? You
> should be able to do that change and get things working magically once
> this code hits mainline.

Well, yes, but I wanted to refer to the binding documentation in the
form of a reference to that SHA1. But I suppose I can just do that in
the cover letter or below ---.

Thanks,
Rasmus