[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112120219.GX4345@gilmour.lan>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:02:19 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...l.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM64: dts: sun50i-h6-pine-h64: state that the DT
supports the modelA
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 04:20:32PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The current sun50i-h6-pine-h64 DT does not specify which model (A or B)
> it supports.
> When this file was created, only modelA was existing, but now both model
> exists and with the time, this DT drifted to support the model B since it is
> the most common one.
> Furtheremore, some part of the model A does not work with it like ethernet and
> HDMI connector (as confirmed by Jernej on IRC).
>
> So it is time to settle the issue, and the easiest way was to state that
> this DT is for model B.
> Easiest since only a small name changes is required.
> Doing the opposite (stating this file is for model A) will add changes (for
> ethernet and HDMI) and so, will break too many setup.
>
> But as asked by the maintainer this patch state this file is for model A.
> In the process this patch adds the missing compoments to made it work on
> model A.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 4 ++--
> .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> index 8a1e38a1d7ab..b8ec616c2538 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> @@ -599,9 +599,9 @@ properties:
> - const: pine64,pine64-plus
> - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64
>
> - - description: Pine64 PineH64
> + - description: Pine64 PineH64 model A
> items:
> - - const: pine64,pine-h64
> + - const: pine64,pine-h64-modelA
You can change the description to make it more obvious if you want to,
but changing the compatible is a no-go.
> - const: allwinner,sun50i-h6
>
> - description: Pine64 LTS
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts
> index 74899ede00fb..1d9afde4d3d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts
> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>
> / {
> - model = "Pine H64";
> - compatible = "pine64,pine-h64", "allwinner,sun50i-h6";
> + model = "Pine H64 model A";
> + compatible = "pine64,pine-h64-modelA", "allwinner,sun50i-h6";
Same thing here, changing the model is fine, the compatible isn't
> aliases {
> ethernet0 = &emac;
> @@ -22,9 +22,10 @@
> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> };
>
> - connector {
> + hdmi_connector: connector {
Why do you need to add the label?
Thanks!
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists