[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112120307.GB5195@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:03:07 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: spi-controller: add wakeup-source
and interrupts
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:54:10PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> + interrupts:
> + items:
> + - description: main interrupt (attention) line.
> + - description: dedicated wakeup interrupt.
> + minItems: 1 # The wakeup interrupt is optional.
> + description:
> + Specifies interrupt lines a device is connected to. Typically a
> + device is wired to a single interrupt line that is used as
> + "attention" signal and also to wake up system when device is
> + set up as wakeup source. However on some systems a dedicated
> + wakeup line might be used.
> + interrupt-names:
> + items:
> + - const: irq
> + - const: wakeup
> + minItems: 1
How will this interact with a SPI device that defines interrupts at the
device level, possibly more than one of them? Especially if the device
has its own idea what the interrupts should be called.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists