linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] crypto: atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bfe0db64-209e-603d-759b-70ac2f691007@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:16:06 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] crypto: atmel - Fix randbuild error



On 11/12/2019 01:56 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2019 04:15 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> External E-Mail
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:13:50AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> What we should do instead is turn DEV_ATMEL_AUTHENC into a bool,
>>
>> Oh and DEV_ATMEL_AUTHENC should also depend on CRYPTO_DEV_ATMEL_AES
>> and lose all its selects.
>>
> 
> How about getting rid of CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ATMEL_AUTHENC entirely?
> 

mm, we can't do this because atmel-aes and atmel-sha are treated as two
separated entities.