linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] kvm: i8254: Deactivate APICv when using in-kernel PIT re-injection mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191112122246.GC2397@rkaganb.sw.ru>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:22:50 +0000
From:   Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
CC:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "graf@...zon.com" <graf@...zon.com>,
        "jschoenh@...zon.de" <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
        "karahmed@...zon.de" <karahmed@...zon.de>,
        "rimasluk@...zon.com" <rimasluk@...zon.com>,
        "Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] kvm: i8254: Deactivate APICv when using
 in-kernel PIT re-injection mode.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:37:53AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> On 11/5/2019 4:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 05/11/19 00:17, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > > This is not too nice for Intel which does support (through the EOI exit
> > > > mask) APICv even if PIT reinjection active.
> > > Hmm, it's tempting to just make svm_load_eoi_exitmap() disable AVIC when
> > > given a non-empty eoi_exit_bitmap, and enable it back on a clear
> > > eoi_exit_bitmap.  This may remove the need to add special treatment to
> > > PIT etc.
> > 
> > That is a very nice idea---we can make that a single disable reason,
> > like APICV_DEACTIVATE_REASON_EOI, and Intel can simply never use it.
> 
> I took at look at the svm_load_eoi_exitmap() and it is called via:
>     kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request() ->
>         KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC -> vcpu_scan_ioapic() ->
>             KVM_REQ_LOAD_EOI_EXITMAP -> vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap()
> 
> The kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request() is called from multiple places:
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c:
>     * kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update() : Called from kvm_set_irq_routing()
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c:
>     * kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update() : (Un)registering irq ack notifier
>     * kvm_set_ioapic() : Setting ioapic irqchip
>     * ioapic_mmio_write() -> ioapic_write_indirect()
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c:
>     * recalculate_apic_map()
> 
> Most calls would be from ioapic_mmio_write()->ioapic_write_indirect().
> 
> In case of AMD AVIC, the svm_load_e::vsoi_exitmap() is called several times, and requesting
> APICV (de)activate from here when the eoi_exit_bitmap is set/clear would introduce
> large overhead especially with SMP machine.

This doesn't look like a hot path, so I'm not sure it needs to be
optimized for performance.  Especially so since
kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request does kvm_make_all_cpus_request which isn't
particularly fast by definition, and I guess the extra overhead there
won't be noticable.

OTOH introducing extra code paths has its maintenance costs, so sticking
the simple logic in svm_load_eoi_exitmap looks attractive.

Just my 2c,
Roman.