[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112140155.GJ23790@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:01:55 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > and fail to free related resources.
> > >
> > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> > > Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.18
> > > Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
> > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Rob, Sean,
> >
> > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> >
> > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
>
> Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.
Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.
Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...
Also +Dave.
-Daniel
>
> Johan
>
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > > struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > > struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > > struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > >
> > > + mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > > mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists