[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1573570243-1903-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:50:43 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: add comments for group_type and balancing at SD_NUMA level
Add comments to describe each state of goup_type and to add some details
about the load balance at NUMA level.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c93d534..268e441 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6986,11 +6986,34 @@ enum fbq_type { regular, remote, all };
* group. see update_sd_pick_busiest().
*/
enum group_type {
+ /*
+ * The group has spare capacity that can be used to process more work.
+ */
group_has_spare = 0,
+ /*
+ * The group is fully used and the tasks don't compete for more CPU
+ * cycles. Nevetheless, some tasks might wait before running.
+ */
group_fully_busy,
+ /*
+ * One task doesn't fit with CPU's capacity and must be migrated on a
+ * more powerful CPU.
+ */
group_misfit_task,
+ /*
+ * One local CPU with higher capacity is available and task should be
+ * migrated on it instead on current CPU.
+ */
group_asym_packing,
+ /*
+ * The tasks affinity prevents the scheduler to balance the load across
+ * the system.
+ */
group_imbalanced,
+ /*
+ * The CPU is overloaded and can't provide expected CPU cycles to all
+ * tasks.
+ */
group_overloaded
};
@@ -8608,7 +8631,11 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
/*
* Try to use spare capacity of local group without overloading it or
- * emptying busiest
+ * emptying busiest.
+ * XXX Spreading tasks across numa nodes is not always the best policy
+ * and special cares should be taken for SD_NUMA domain level before
+ * spreading the tasks. For now, load_balance() fully relies on
+ * NUMA_BALANCING and fbq_classify_group/rq to overide the decision.
*/
if (local->group_type == group_has_spare) {
if (busiest->group_type > group_fully_busy) {
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists