[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4fb1c1506c5a5566ed20b564970a97eb6b6c94d.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:35:57 +0000
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: pll14xx: use writel_relaxed
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 12:15 +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: pll14xx: use writel_relaxed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 07:24 +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > It not make sense to use writel, use relaxed variant.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Peng,
> >
> > Please explain why this change is needed.
>
> writel has a barrier, however that barrier is not needed,
> because device memory access is in order and clk driver
> has spin_lock or other lock to make sure write finished.
>
Make sure you add this in the commit message for v2 :).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists