[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4577bd33-e4b5-9869-3760-c55471382f01@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:47:13 +0100
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/mcelog: also allow building for
32-bit kernels
On 13.11.2019 01:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/11/19 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> There's no apparent reason why it can be used on 64-bit only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>>
>> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ config XEN_ACPI_PROCESSOR
>>
>> config XEN_MCE_LOG
>> bool "Xen platform mcelog"
>> - depends on XEN_DOM0 && X86_64 && X86_MCE
>> + depends on XEN_DOM0 && X86 && X86_MCE
>
> Can we have X86_MCE without X86?
I don't think we can. Is this a request to drop the middle
operand altogether?
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists