[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65fc0bffbcb2296d121b3d5a79108e76@natalenko.name>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:25:14 +0100
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com,
Chris Evich <cevich@...hat.com>,
Patrick Dung <patdung100@...il.com>,
Thorsten Schubert <tschubert@...h.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not
referred by any process
On 13.11.2019 14:52, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> I'm not sure if I see things right, but this commit along with v5.3.11
>> kernel causes almost all boots to hang (for instance, on mounting the
>> FS). Once the scheduler is changed to something else than BFQ (I set
>> the I/O scheduler early via udev rule), multiple reboots go just fine.
>>
>
> If you switch back to bfq after the boot, can you still reproduce the
> hang?
I didn't try to switch schedulers, but what I see now is once the system
is able to boot with BFQ, the I/O can still hang on I/O burst (which for
me happens to happen during VM reboot).
This may also not hang forever, but just slow down considerably. I've
noticed this inside a KVM VM, not on a real HW.
>> Is this commit also applicable to 5.3 kernels?
>
> It is.
OK, thanks for clarification.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists