linux-kernel - [RFC 1/2] docs: ftrace: Clarify the RAM impact of buffer_size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e4a803c3e24140172855748b4a275c31920e208.1573661658.git.frank@generalsoftwareinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:32:36 -0500
From:   "Frank A. Cancio Bello" <frank@...eralsoftwareinc.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     joel@...lfernandes.org, saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org
Subject: [RFC 1/2] docs: ftrace: Clarify the RAM impact of buffer_size_kb

The current text could mislead the user into believing that the number
of pages allocated by each CPU ring buffer is calculated by the round
up of the division: buffer_size_kb / PAGE_SIZE.

Clarify that the number of pages allocated is the round up of the
division: buffer_size_kb / (PAGE_SIZE - BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE). Add an
example that shows how the number of pages allocated could be off by
5 pages more compared with how the current text suggests it should be.

Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frank A. Cancio Bello <frank@...eralsoftwareinc.com>
---
 Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
index e3060eedb22d..ec2c4eff95a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
@@ -188,8 +188,17 @@ of ftrace. Here is a list of some of the key files:
 	If the last page allocated has room for more bytes
 	than requested, the rest of the page will be used,
 	making the actual allocation bigger than requested or shown.
-	( Note, the size may not be a multiple of the page size
-	due to buffer management meta-data. )
+
+        The number of pages allocated for each CPU buffer may not
+        be the same than the round up of the division:
+        buffer_size_kb / PAGE_SIZE. This is because part of each page is
+        used to store a page header with metadata. E.g. with
+        buffer_size_kb=4096 (kilobytes), a PAGE_SIZE=4096 bytes and a
+        BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE=16 bytes (BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE is the size of the
+        page header with metadata) the number of pages allocated for each
+        CPU buffer is 1029, not 1024. The formula for calculating the
+        number of pages allocated for each CPU buffer is the round up of:
+        buffer_size_kb / (PAGE_SIZE - BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE).
 
 	Buffer sizes for individual CPUs may vary
 	(see "per_cpu/cpu0/buffer_size_kb" below), and if they do
-- 
2.17.1