[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r22bhgz1.fsf@iwork.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:35:30 +0200
From: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"Linux-Kernel\@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: access registers via a
regmap
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:30, Adrian Ratiu
> <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Convert the common bridge code and the two rockchip & stm
>> drivers which currently use it to the regmap API in
>> anticipation for further changes to make it more generic and
>> add older DSI host controller support as found on i.mx6 based
>> devices.
>>
>> The regmap becomes an internal state of the bridge. No
>> functional changes other than requiring the platform drivers to
>> use the pre-configured regmap supplied by the bridge after its
>> probe() call instead of ioremp'ing the registers themselves.
>>
>> In subsequent commits the bridge will become able to detect the
>> DSI host core version and init the regmap with different
>> register layouts. The platform drivers will continue to use the
>> regmap without modifications or worrying about the specific
>> layout in use (in other words the layout is abstracted away via
>> the regmap).
>>
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
>
> I should have been clearer earlier - I didn't quite review the
> patch. Is is now though. Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov
> <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Sorry about that, I got confused and thought you reviewed it all.
>
> Admittedly a couple of nitpicks (DRIVER_NAME, zero initialize of
> val) could have been left out. It's not a big deal, there's no
> need to polish those.
I'll address them in v3 as well as updating your mail address.
Thanks for reviewing!
>
> -Emil
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists