lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACJJ=pzyn2DX0fcAjzNs-ZXMByt=GcH5005+Ki28uoW1AeQ-yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:23:07 -0800
From:   Jon Flatley <jflat@...omium.org>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Jon Flatley <jflat@...omium.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, groeck@...omium.org,
        sre@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] platform: chrome: Added cros-ec-typec driver

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 4:55 AM kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
> [cannot apply to v5.4-rc7 next-20191113]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jon-Flatley/ChromeOS-EC-USB-C-Connector-Class/20191113-193504
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
>
> coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
> >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c:223:9-16: ERROR: PTR_ERR applied after initialization to constant on line 222
>
> vim +223 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
>
>    206
>    207  static int cros_typec_add_partner(struct typec_data *typec, int port_num,
>    208                  bool pd_enabled)
>    209  {
>    210          struct port_data *port;
>    211          struct typec_partner_desc p_desc;
>    212          int ret;
>    213
>    214          port = typec->ports[port_num];
>    215          p_desc.usb_pd = pd_enabled;
>    216          p_desc.identity = &port->p_identity;
>    217
>    218          port->partner = typec_register_partner(port->port, &p_desc);
>    219          if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(port->partner)) {
>    220                  dev_err(typec->dev, "Port %d partner register failed\n",
>    221                                  port_num);
>  > 222                  port->partner = NULL;
>  > 223                  return PTR_ERR(port->partner);
>    224          }
>    225
>    226          ret = cros_typec_query_pd_info(typec, port_num);
>    227          if (ret < 0) {
>    228                  dev_err(typec->dev, "Port %d PD query failed\n", port_num);
>    229                  typec_unregister_partner(port->partner);
>    230                  port->partner = NULL;
>    231                  return ret;
>    232          }
>    233
>    234          ret = typec_partner_set_identity(port->partner);
>    235          return ret;
>    236  }
>    237
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

This patch is based off of the chrome-platform for-next branch.

base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chrome-platform/linux.git
for-next

Is this incorrect? I'm happy to rebase if necessary.

Thanks,
-Jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ