lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191113175035.GA8553@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:50:35 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, xiezhipeng1@...wei.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util

Le Wednesday 13 Nov 2019 à 15:09:47 (+0100), Dietmar Eggemann a écrit :
> On 13.11.19 14:30, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 11:50, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12.11.19 16:05, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>> Le Tuesday 12 Nov 2019 à 15:48:13 (+0100), Vincent Guittot a écrit :
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>>> @@ -7493,9 +7495,9 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
> >>>>       * that RT, DL and IRQ signals have been updated before updating CFS.
> >>>>       */
> >>>>      curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
> >>>> -    update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> >>>> -    update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> >>>> -    update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
> >>>> +    decayed |= update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
> >>>> +    decayed |= update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
> >>>> +    decayed |= update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
> >>
> >> Why not 'decayed  = update_cfs_rq_load_avg()' like in the
> >> !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case?
> > 
> > Because it is handled by the update_load_avg() in
> > for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe() loop
> > 
> > This means that we can have 2 calls to cpufreq_update_util in
> > update_blocked_average() but at least the values will be up to date in
> > both calls unlike previously.
> > 
> > I'm going to prepare an additional patch to remove this useless call.
> > I have also seen some possible further optimization that i need to
> > study a bit more before preparing a patch
> 
> I see. The update_load_avg() call for the taskgroup skeleton se
> (cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu]). But what happens to the cpu which only has the
> root cfs_rq i the list? It doesn't have a skeleton se.

you're right. I have to add the following to make sure it will be called

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2eb1aa8..9fc077c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7604,9 +7604,13 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
                        cpu,
                        cfs_rq == &rq->cfs ? 0 : (long)cfs_rq->tg );
 
-               if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq))
+               if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
                        update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
 
+                       if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
+                               decayed = 1;
+               }
+
                trace_sched_load_contrib_blocked(cpu,
                        &cfs_rq->avg,
                        cfs_rq == &rq->cfs ? 0 : (long)cfs_rq->tg );


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ