[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191113183211.GB4402@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:32:11 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phh@....me,
b.galvani@...il.com, stefan@...er.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 07:26:43PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> LDO9 and LDO10 were listed with the same enable bits.
> That looks insane and there are no provisions in the code for handling such
> a special case. Also other out-of-tree drivers use a separate bit to
> enable it.
This definitely looks like a bug but without a datasheet or testing it's
worrying guessing at the register bit to use for the enable for the
second LDO...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists