lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191113193159.GA221701@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:32:00 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        João Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] crypto: x86/aesni: Remove glue function macro
 usage

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:25:14AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> In order to remove the callsite function casts, regularize the function
> prototypes for helpers to avoid triggering Control-Flow Integrity checks
> during indirect function calls. Where needed, to avoid changes to
> pointer math, u8 pointers are internally cast back to u128 pointers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 45 +++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> index 3e707e81afdb..f47afa5ae8ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> @@ -83,10 +83,8 @@ struct gcm_context_data {
>  
>  asmlinkage int aesni_set_key(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, const u8 *in_key,
>  			     unsigned int key_len);
> -asmlinkage void aesni_enc(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
> -			  const u8 *in);
> -asmlinkage void aesni_dec(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
> -			  const u8 *in);
> +asmlinkage void aesni_enc(void *ctx, u8 *out, const u8 *in);
> +asmlinkage void aesni_dec(void *ctx, u8 *out, const u8 *in);
>  asmlinkage void aesni_ecb_enc(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
>  			      const u8 *in, unsigned int len);
>  asmlinkage void aesni_ecb_dec(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
> @@ -107,7 +105,7 @@ asmlinkage void aesni_ctr_enc(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
>  			      const u8 *in, unsigned int len, u8 *iv);
>  
>  asmlinkage void aesni_xts_crypt8(struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx, u8 *out,
> -				 const u8 *in, bool enc, u8 *iv);
> +				 const u8 *in, bool enc, le128 *iv);

These functions in aesni-intel_asm.S have comments that show the function
prototypes.  Can you please keep them in sync?

> -static void aesni_xts_tweak(void *ctx, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
> +static void aesni_xts_enc(void *ctx, u8 *dst, const u8 *src, le128 *iv)
>  {
> -	aesni_enc(ctx, out, in);
> +	glue_xts_crypt_128bit_one(ctx, (u128 *)dst, (const u128 *)src, iv,
> +				  aesni_enc);
>  }

For the src and dst, how about making glue_xts_crypt_128bit_one() take u8
instead of u128?  That would avoid having to add these u8 => u128 casts to all
10 callers of glue_xts_crypt_128bit_one().

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ