[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdxO4TZm4t==kePydVY+qWRNQn6aaGKb3sK8sAJ8yFmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:02:31 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [tcp] f859a44847: stderr.fastopen-client.pkt:#:runtime_error_in_sendto_call:Expected_result#but_got-#with_errno#(Operation_now_in_progress)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:04 PM kernel test robot
<rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
>
> commit: f859a448470304135f7a1af0083b99e188873bb4 ("tcp: allow zerocopy with fastopen")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> in testcase: packetdrill
> with following parameters:
>
>
> on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 8G
>
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
The report shows the complete output of a complete packetdrill run.
>From that it is not immediately obvious which packetdrill test output
changed.
The subject line calls out tcp/zerocopy/fastopen-client.pkt. The
result of that test are expected to change with this commit
f859a4484703 ("tcp: allow zerocopy with fastopen"), because this test
was added exactly to verify the feature introduced with that commit.
The report shows this specific test passing for ipv4 and
ipv4-mapped-v6. I cannot explain why that run failed for ipv6. On my
runs all three pass at this commit:
$ git clone https://github.com/google/packetdrill
$ cd packetdrill/gtests/net
$ (cd packetdrill; make)
$ ./packetdrill/run_all.py tcp/zerocopy
Ran 33 tests: 33 passing, 0 failing, 0 timed out (7.28
sec): tcp/zerocopy
and fail on the previous commit, along with all three versions of
fastopen-server.pkt and closed.pkt:
$ ./packetdrill/run_all.py tcp/zerocopy
Ran 33 tests: 24 passing, 9 failing, 0 timed out (7.22
sec): tcp/zerocopy
All this is expected, so there is nothing to fix for this report.
This was on a kernel built with `make defconfig; make kvmconfig` and
additionally CONFIG_TUN=y. Though those details should be immaterial
here.
Great that the test robot is running packetdrill tests, btw! Good to
know we upstreamed them for a reason.
But how did it end up testing such an old kernel? This commit was added in 5.1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists