linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: tps65910: allow using RTC without alarm interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:08:05 +0300
From:   Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@...il.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: tps65910: allow using RTC without alarm interrupt

On 19-11-11 18:19, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This needs a proper commit message.

Add in v2.
 
> On 09/11/2019 18:46:52+0300, Andrey Skvortsov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> > index 2c0467a9e717..aa3a001ef413 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
> > @@ -361,6 +361,13 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops tps65910_rtc_ops = {
> >  	.set_offset	= tps65910_set_offset,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct rtc_class_ops tps65910_rtc_ops_noirq = {
> > +	.read_time	= tps65910_rtc_read_time,
> > +	.set_time	= tps65910_rtc_set_time,
> > +	.read_offset	= tps65910_read_offset,
> > +	.set_offset	= tps65910_set_offset,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int tps65910_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct tps65910 *tps65910 = NULL;
> > @@ -415,13 +422,17 @@ static int tps65910_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		tps65910_rtc_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
> >  		dev_name(&pdev->dev), &pdev->dev);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
> > -		return ret;
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request IRQ:%d failed, err = %d\n",
> > +			 irq, ret);
> 
> Do we actually need an error message here?

You are right. This is definitely not an error anymore.
What about
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
like some other drivers do?


grep -RHn 'unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled'
rtc-rv8803.c:576:			dev_warn(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-m41t80.c:914:			dev_warn(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-rv3028.c:651:			dev_warn(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-pcf85363.c:416:			dev_warn(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-pcf85063.c:458:				 "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-rv3029c2.c:828:			dev_warn(dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-rx8025.c:540:			dev_err(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");
rtc-abx80x.c:839:			dev_err(&client->dev, "unable to request IRQ, alarms disabled\n");


> 
> > +		irq = -1;
> >  	}
> >  	tps_rtc->irq = irq;
> > -	device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, 1);
> > +	if (irq != -1) {
> > +		device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, 1);
> > +		tps_rtc->rtc->ops = &tps65910_rtc_ops;
> > +	} else
> > +		tps_rtc->rtc->ops = &tps65910_rtc_ops_noirq;
> >  
> > -	tps_rtc->rtc->ops = &tps65910_rtc_ops;
> >  	tps_rtc->rtc->range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_2000;
> >  	tps_rtc->rtc->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2099;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

-- 
Best regards,
Andrey Skvortsov

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)