[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9152597.fJySsU3eCD@positron.chronox.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:36:22 +0100
From: Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ray Strode <rstrode@...hat.com>,
William Jon McCann <mccann@....edu>,
zhangjs <zachary@...shancloud.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
"Peter, Matthias" <matthias.peter@....bund.de>,
Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Roman Drahtmueller <draht@...altsekun.de>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 11/12] LRNG - add SP800-90B compliant health tests
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2019, 20:58:32 CET schrieb Alexander E. Patrakov:
Hi Alexander,
> > +config LRNG_HEALTH_TESTS
> > + bool "Enable noise source online health tests"
> > + help
> > + The online health tests validate the noise source at
> > + runtime for fatal errors. These tests include SP800-90B
> > + compliant tests which are invoked if the system is booted
> > + with fips=1. In case of fatal errors during active
> > + SP800-90B tests, the issue is logged and the noise
> > + data is discarded. These tests are required for full
> > + compliance with SP800-90B.
>
> How have you tested that these tests work at runtime? Maybe add some
> code under a new CONFIG item that depends on CONFIG_BROKEN that
> deliberately botches the RNG and triggers failures?
I am unable to find sensible information about CONFIG_BROKEN in the recent
kernel tree.
Do you happen to have a pointer on how that option is to be used?
Thanks a lot
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists