linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 080/115] x86/fsgsbase/64: Fix ptrace() to read the FS/GS base accurately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191113015622.11592-80-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 20:55:47 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Chang S . Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Markus T Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 080/115] x86/fsgsbase/64: Fix ptrace() to read the FS/GS base accurately

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 07e1d88adaaeab247b300926f78cc3f950dbeda3 ]

On 64-bit kernels ptrace can read the FS/GS base using the register access
APIs (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, etc.) or PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL.

Make both of these mechanisms return the actual FS/GS base.

This will improve debuggability by providing the correct information
to ptracer such as GDB.

[ chang: Rebased and revised patch description. ]
[ mingo: Revised the changelog some more. ]

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus T Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537312139-5580-2-git-send-email-chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 584cdd475bb31..734549492a18b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
 #include <asm/traps.h>
 #include <asm/syscall.h>
+#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 
 #include "tls.h"
 
@@ -343,6 +344,49 @@ static int set_segment_reg(struct task_struct *task,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static unsigned long task_seg_base(struct task_struct *task,
+				   unsigned short selector)
+{
+	unsigned short idx = selector >> 3;
+	unsigned long base;
+
+	if (likely((selector & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == 0)) {
+		if (unlikely(idx >= GDT_ENTRIES))
+			return 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * There are no user segments in the GDT with nonzero bases
+		 * other than the TLS segments.
+		 */
+		if (idx < GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN || idx > GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MAX)
+			return 0;
+
+		idx -= GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN;
+		base = get_desc_base(&task->thread.tls_array[idx]);
+	} else {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
+		struct ldt_struct *ldt;
+
+		/*
+		 * If performance here mattered, we could protect the LDT
+		 * with RCU.  This is a slow path, though, so we can just
+		 * take the mutex.
+		 */
+		mutex_lock(&task->mm->context.lock);
+		ldt = task->mm->context.ldt;
+		if (unlikely(idx >= ldt->nr_entries))
+			base = 0;
+		else
+			base = get_desc_base(ldt->entries + idx);
+		mutex_unlock(&task->mm->context.lock);
+#else
+		base = 0;
+#endif
+	}
+
+	return base;
+}
+
 #endif	/* CONFIG_X86_32 */
 
 static unsigned long get_flags(struct task_struct *task)
@@ -436,18 +480,16 @@ static unsigned long getreg(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long offset)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct, fs_base): {
-		/*
-		 * XXX: This will not behave as expected if called on
-		 * current or if fsindex != 0.
-		 */
-		return task->thread.fsbase;
+		if (task->thread.fsindex == 0)
+			return task->thread.fsbase;
+		else
+			return task_seg_base(task, task->thread.fsindex);
 	}
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct, gs_base): {
-		/*
-		 * XXX: This will not behave as expected if called on
-		 * current or if fsindex != 0.
-		 */
-		return task->thread.gsbase;
+		if (task->thread.gsindex == 0)
+			return task->thread.gsbase;
+		else
+			return task_seg_base(task, task->thread.gsindex);
 	}
 #endif
 	}
-- 
2.20.1