linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_down_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191113102855.868390100@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:21:19 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org
Cc:     oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com,
        bristot@...hat.com, longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net,
        jack@...e.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_down_read_trylock()

In preparation for removing the embedded rwsem and building a custom
lock, extract the read-trylock primitive.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem);
 
-bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try)
+static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
 
@@ -70,14 +70,21 @@ bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw
 	 * If !readers_block the critical section starts here, matched by the
 	 * release in percpu_up_write().
 	 */
-	if (likely(!smp_load_acquire(&sem->readers_block)))
+	if (likely(!atomic_read_acquire(&sem->readers_block)))
 		return true;
 
-	/*
-	 * Per the above comment; we still have preemption disabled and
-	 * will thus decrement on the same CPU as we incremented.
-	 */
-	__percpu_up_read(sem);
+	__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
+
+	/* Prod writer to re-evaluate readers_active_check() */
+	rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try)
+{
+	if (__percpu_down_read_trylock(sem))
+		return true;
 
 	if (try)
 		return false;