[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114073459.GB26546@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:34:59 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, phil@...pberrypi.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Using a mask to represent bus DMA constraints has a set of limitations.
> The biggest one being it can only hold a power of two (minus one). The
> DMA mapping code is already aware of this and treats dev->bus_dma_mask
> as a limit. This quirk is already used by some architectures although
> still rare.
>
> With the introduction of the Raspberry Pi 4 we've found a new contender
> for the use of bus DMA limits, as its PCIe bus can only address the
> lower 3GB of memory (of a total of 4GB). This is impossible to represent
> with a mask. To make things worse the device-tree code rounds non power
> of two bus DMA limits to the next power of two, which is unacceptable in
> this case.
>
> In the light of this, rename dev->bus_dma_mask to dev->bus_dma_limit all
> over the tree and treat it as such. Note that dev->bus_dma_limit is
> meant to contain the higher accesible DMA address.
This looks sensible modulo the minor comments in this thread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
>
> ---
>
> Note this is rebased on top of Christoph's latest DMA series:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768600.html
FYI, I'll plan to merge those tonight unless anyone screams.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists