[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <754ec843-eb8f-5149-bf7f-ec4abf938821@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:39:01 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov
Hi Saravana,
On 11/14/19 5:23 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:48 PM Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Saravana,
>>
>> Any other progress of this series?
>
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> reasons.
>
> I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> will be good to go.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I'll expect the your next version.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists