linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v10 9/9] powerpc/ima: indicate kernel modules appended signatures are enforced

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <47DFy61bydz9sSL@ozlabs.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:08:13 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 9/9] powerpc/ima: indicate kernel modules appended signatures are enforced

On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 03:31:34 UTC, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> The arch specific kernel module policy rule requires kernel modules to
> be signed, either as an IMA signature, stored as an xattr, or as an
> appended signature.  As a result, kernel modules appended signatures
> could be enforced without "sig_enforce" being set or reflected in
> /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce.  This patch sets
> "sig_enforce".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d72ea4915c7e6fa5e7b9022a34df66e375bfe46c

cheers