[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CC298DB4-3107-4E9A-AD11-47AA070D85EF@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:22:01 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com, Chris Evich <cevich@...hat.com>,
Patrick Dung <patdung100@...il.com>,
Thorsten Schubert <tschubert@...h.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not
referred by any process
> Il giorno 13 nov 2019, alle ore 23:46, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> ha scritto:
>
> On 11/13/19 10:42 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 13 nov 2019, alle ore 16:01, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On 13.11.2019 15:25, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>>>> I didn't try to switch schedulers, but what I see now is once the
>>>> system is able to boot with BFQ, the I/O can still hang on I/O burst
>>>> (which for me happens to happen during VM reboot).
>>>> This may also not hang forever, but just slow down considerably. I've
>>>> noticed this inside a KVM VM, not on a real HW.
>>>
>>> Possible call traces:
>>
>> Ok, you may have given me enough information, thank you very much.
>>
>> Could you please apply the attached (compressed) patch on top of my
>> offending patch? For review purposes, here is the simple change:
>
> FWIW, I dropped the previous patch.
>
Thanks. I'm sending a V2.
Thanks,
Paolo
> --
> Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists