[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114104340.GT4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:43:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Gary Hook <Gary.Hook@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] perf/cgroup: Do not switch system-wide events
in cgroup switch
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:30:42PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> When counting system-wide events and cgroup events simultaneously, the
> system-wide events are always scheduled out then back in during cgroup
> switches, bringing extra overhead and possibly missing events. Switching
> out system wide flexible events may be necessary if the scheduled in
> task's cgroups have pinned events that need to be scheduled in at a higher
> priority than the system wide flexible events.
I'm thinking this patch is actively broken. groups->index 'group' wide
and therefore across cpu/cgroup boundaries.
There is no !cgroup to cgroup hierarchy as this patch seems to assume,
specifically look at how the merge sort in visit_groups_merge() allows
cgroup events to be picked before !cgroup events.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists