linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:54:30 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phh@....me,
        b.galvani@...il.com, stefan@...er.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > This definitely looks like a bug but without a datasheet or testing it's
> > worrying guessing at the register bit to use for the enable for the
> > second LDO...

> I am hoping for a Tested-By: from the one who has submitted the patch
> for the regulator. 

Or a reviewed-by from someone with access to the datasheet.

> Well, it is not just guessing, it is there in the url I referenced. But
> I would of course prefer a better source. At first I wanted to spread
> my findings.

The URL you provided looked to be for a different part though?

> I am not pushing anyone to accept it without Tested-By/Reviewed-Bys.
> What is a good way to avoid people bumping into this bug?
> Maybe I can find the right C on the board to check.

That'd be good.  Or we could fix it by just removing enable/disable
control for the second LDO entirely and if someone needs that control
they can always re-add it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)