[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2758feea-8d6e-c690-5cac-d42213f2024b@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:01:35 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To: Han Xu <xhnjupt@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: Fix mounting under new mount API
Hi,
On 2019/11/14 4:38, Han Xu wrote:
> Tested the JFFS2 on 5.4 kernel as the instruction said, still got some
> errors, any ideas?
>
>
> With the patch,
>
> root@...8mmevk:~# cat /proc/mtd
> dev: size erasesize name
> mtd0: 00400000 00020000 "mtdram test device"
> mtd1: 04000000 00020000 "5d120000.spi"
> root@...8mmevk:~# mtd_debug info /dev/mtd0
> mtd.type = MTD_RAM
> mtd.flags = MTD_CAP_RAM
> mtd.size = 4194304 (4M)
> mtd.erasesize = 131072 (128K)
> mtd.writesize = 1
> mtd.oobsize = 0
> regions = 0
>
> root@...8mmevk:~# flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 0
> Erasing 128 Kibyte @ 3e0000 -- 100 % complete
> root@...8mmevk:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock0 test_dir/
> root@...8mmevk:~# mount
> /dev/mtdblock0 on /home/root/test_dir type jffs2 (rw,relatime)
>
> BUT, it's not writable.
You should revert the following commit to make it work:
commit f2538f999345405f7d2e1194c0c8efa4e11f7b3a
Author: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Date: Wed Jul 24 10:46:58 2019 +0800
jffs2: Fix possible null-pointer dereferences in jffs2_add_frag_to_fragtree()
The revert needs to get into v5.4. Maybe Richard has forget about it ?
Regards,
Tao
>
> root@...8mmevk:~# cp test_file test_dir/
> cp: error writing 'test_dir/test_file': Invalid argument
>
> root@...8mmevk:~# dd if=/dev/urandom of=test_dir/test_file bs=1k count=1
> dd: error writing 'test_dir/test_file': Invalid argument
> 1+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes copied, 0.000855156 s, 0.0 kB/s
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:38 AM Sergei Shtylyov
> <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> On 26.09.2019 17:21, David Howells wrote:
>>
>>> The mounting of jffs2 is broken due to the changes from the new mount API
>>> because it specifies a "source" operation, but then doesn't actually
>>> process it. But because it specified it, it doesn't return -ENOPARAM and
>>
>> What specified what? Too many "it"'s to figure that out. :-)
>>
>>> the caller doesn't process it either and the source gets lost.
>>>
>>> Fix this by simply removing the source parameter from jffs2 and letting the
>>> VFS deal with it in the default manner.
>>>
>>> To test it, enable CONFIG_MTD_MTDRAM and allow the default size and erase
>>> block size parameters, then try and mount the /dev/mtdblock<N> file that
>>> that creates as jffs2. No need to initialise it.
>>
>> One "that" should be enough. :-)
>>
>>> Fixes: ec10a24f10c8 ("vfs: Convert jffs2 to use the new mount API")
>>> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>>> cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
>>> cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>> cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
>> [...]
>>
>> MBR, Sergei
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists