[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1ae185b3c9a420713d21e9f3d6318f0ab557081.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:18:24 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] ceph: add support for TYPE_MSGR2 address
decode
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 10:57 +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> The new format actually includes two addresses: one the new messenger v2,
> and other for the legacy v1, which is the only one currently understood
> by kernel clients. Add code to pick the legacy address and ignore the v2
> one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ceph/decode.h | 3 ++-
> net/ceph/decode.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/decode.h b/include/linux/ceph/decode.h
> index 450384fe487c..2a2f07dfb39c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ceph/decode.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/decode.h
> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ static inline void ceph_encode_timespec64(struct ceph_timespec *tv,
> * sockaddr_storage <-> ceph_sockaddr
> */
> #define CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_NONE 0
> -#define CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_LEGACY __cpu_to_le32(1)
> +#define CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_LEGACY __cpu_to_le32(1) /* legacy msgr1 */
> +#define CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_MSGR2 __cpu_to_le32(2) /* msgr2 protocol */
>
> static inline void ceph_encode_banner_addr(struct ceph_entity_addr *a)
> {
> diff --git a/net/ceph/decode.c b/net/ceph/decode.c
> index eea529595a7a..613a2bc6f805 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/decode.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/decode.c
> @@ -67,16 +67,45 @@ ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int
> +ceph_decode_entity_addr_versioned_msgr2(void **p, void *end,
> + struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
> +{
> + struct ceph_entity_addr tmp_addr;
> + struct ceph_entity_addr *paddr = addr;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + ceph_decode_skip_32(p, end, bad); /* hard-coded '2' */
> + ceph_decode_skip_8(p, end, bad); /* hard-coded '1' */
> +
> + ret = ceph_decode_entity_addr_versioned(p, end, paddr);
> + if (ret)
> + goto bad;
> + /* If we already have a v1 address, simply skip over the other address */
> + if (paddr->type == CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_LEGACY)
> + paddr = &tmp_addr;
> +
> + ceph_decode_skip_8(p, end, bad); /* hard-coded '1' */
> +
> + ret = ceph_decode_entity_addr_versioned(p, end, paddr);
> +
> +bad:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int
> ceph_decode_entity_addr(void **p, void *end, struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
> {
> u8 marker;
>
> ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, marker, bad);
> - if (marker == 1)
> + if (marker == CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_MSGR2)
> + return ceph_decode_entity_addr_versioned_msgr2(p, end, addr);
> + else if (marker == CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_LEGACY)
> return ceph_decode_entity_addr_versioned(p, end, addr);
> - else if (marker == 0)
> + else if (marker == CEPH_ENTITY_ADDR_TYPE_NONE)
> return ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(p, end, addr);
You're decoding a byte into "marker" and then comparing that to a __le32
value. They almost certainly won't match correctly on a BE arch.
> +
> bad:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists