[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97cb578c-d302-9be3-5fe6-b2030b318bcc@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:16:53 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Gary Hook <Gary.Hook@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] perf/cgroup: Do not switch system-wide events in
cgroup switch
On 11/14/2019 8:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:46:51AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2019 5:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:30:42PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> When counting system-wide events and cgroup events simultaneously, the
>>>> system-wide events are always scheduled out then back in during cgroup
>>>> switches, bringing extra overhead and possibly missing events. Switching
>>>> out system wide flexible events may be necessary if the scheduled in
>>>> task's cgroups have pinned events that need to be scheduled in at a higher
>>>> priority than the system wide flexible events.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking this patch is actively broken. groups->index 'group' wide
>>> and therefore across cpu/cgroup boundaries.
>>>
>>> There is no !cgroup to cgroup hierarchy as this patch seems to assume,
>>> specifically look at how the merge sort in visit_groups_merge() allows
>>> cgroup events to be picked before !cgroup events.
>>
>>
>> No, the patch intends to avoid switch !cgroup during cgroup context switch.
>
> Which is wrong.
>
Why we want to switch !cgroup system-wide event in context switch?
How should current perf handle this case?
For example,
User A: perf stat -e cycles -G cgroup1
User B: perf stat -e instructions -a
There is only one cpuctx for each CPU. So both cycles and instructions
are tracked in flexible_active list.
When user A left, the cgroup context-switch schedule out everything
including both cycles and instructions.
It seems that we will never switch the instructions event back for user B.
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists