| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:17:50 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Viktor Rosendahl (BMW)" <viktor.rosendahl@...il.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 16/33] ftrace: Implement fs notification for tracing_max_latency
From: "Viktor Rosendahl (BMW)" <viktor.rosendahl@...il.com>
This patch implements the feature that the tracing_max_latency file,
e.g. /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_max_latency will receive
notifications through the fsnotify framework when a new latency is
available.
One particularly interesting use of this facility is when enabling
threshold tracing, through /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_thresh,
together with the preempt/irqsoff tracers. This makes it possible to
implement a user space program that can, with equal probability,
obtain traces of latencies that occur immediately after each other in
spite of the fact that the preempt/irqsoff tracers operate in overwrite
mode.
This facility works with the hwlat, preempt/irqsoff, and wakeup
tracers.
The tracers may call the latency_fsnotify() from places such as
__schedule() or do_idle(); this makes it impossible to call
queue_work() directly without risking a deadlock. The same would
happen with a softirq, kernel thread or tasklet. For this reason we
use the irq_work mechanism to call queue_work().
This patch creates a new workqueue. The reason for doing this is that
I wanted to use the WQ_UNBOUND and WQ_HIGHPRI flags. My thinking was
that WQ_UNBOUND might help with the latency in some important cases.
If we use:
queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &tr->fsnotify_work);
then the work will (almost) always execute on the same CPU but if we are
unlucky that CPU could be too busy while there could be another CPU in
the system that would be able to process the work soon enough.
queue_work_on() could be used to queue the work on another CPU but it
seems difficult to select the right CPU.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191008220824.7911-2-viktor.rosendahl@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Rosendahl (BMW) <viktor.rosendahl@...il.com>
[ Added max() to have one compare for max latency ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/trace/trace.h | 18 +++++++++
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 11 ++++--
3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 5ea8c7c0f2d7..f093a433cb42 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
#include <linux/trace.h>
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
+#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "trace.h"
#include "trace_output.h"
@@ -1497,6 +1500,74 @@ static ssize_t trace_seq_to_buffer(struct trace_seq *s, void *buf, size_t cnt)
}
unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_thresh;
+static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
+
+#if (defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)) && \
+ defined(CONFIG_FSNOTIFY)
+
+static struct workqueue_struct *fsnotify_wq;
+
+static void latency_fsnotify_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct trace_array *tr = container_of(work, struct trace_array,
+ fsnotify_work);
+ fsnotify(tr->d_max_latency->d_inode, FS_MODIFY,
+ tr->d_max_latency->d_inode, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static void latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq(struct irq_work *iwork)
+{
+ struct trace_array *tr = container_of(iwork, struct trace_array,
+ fsnotify_irqwork);
+ queue_work(fsnotify_wq, &tr->fsnotify_work);
+}
+
+static void trace_create_maxlat_file(struct trace_array *tr,
+ struct dentry *d_tracer)
+{
+ INIT_WORK(&tr->fsnotify_work, latency_fsnotify_workfn);
+ init_irq_work(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork, latency_fsnotify_workfn_irq);
+ tr->d_max_latency = trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", 0644,
+ d_tracer, &tr->max_latency,
+ &tracing_max_lat_fops);
+}
+
+__init static int latency_fsnotify_init(void)
+{
+ fsnotify_wq = alloc_workqueue("tr_max_lat_wq",
+ WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+ if (!fsnotify_wq) {
+ pr_err("Unable to allocate tr_max_lat_wq\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+late_initcall_sync(latency_fsnotify_init);
+
+void latency_fsnotify(struct trace_array *tr)
+{
+ if (!fsnotify_wq)
+ return;
+ /*
+ * We cannot call queue_work(&tr->fsnotify_work) from here because it's
+ * possible that we are called from __schedule() or do_idle(), which
+ * could cause a deadlock.
+ */
+ irq_work_queue(&tr->fsnotify_irqwork);
+}
+
+/*
+ * (defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)) && \
+ * defined(CONFIG_FSNOTIFY)
+ */
+#else
+
+#define trace_create_maxlat_file(tr, d_tracer) \
+ trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", 0644, d_tracer, \
+ &tr->max_latency, &tracing_max_lat_fops)
+
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
/*
@@ -1536,6 +1607,7 @@ __update_max_tr(struct trace_array *tr, struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu)
/* record this tasks comm */
tracing_record_cmdline(tsk);
+ latency_fsnotify(tr);
}
/**
@@ -8594,8 +8666,7 @@ init_tracer_tracefs(struct trace_array *tr, struct dentry *d_tracer)
create_trace_options_dir(tr);
#if defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)
- trace_create_file("tracing_max_latency", 0644, d_tracer,
- &tr->max_latency, &tracing_max_lat_fops);
+ trace_create_maxlat_file(tr, d_tracer);
#endif
if (ftrace_create_function_files(tr, d_tracer))
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 8b590f10bc72..718eb998c13e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#include <linux/trace_events.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/glob.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS
#include <asm/unistd.h> /* For NR_SYSCALLS */
@@ -264,6 +266,11 @@ struct trace_array {
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)
unsigned long max_latency;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
+ struct dentry *d_max_latency;
+ struct work_struct fsnotify_work;
+ struct irq_work fsnotify_irqwork;
+#endif
#endif
struct trace_pid_list __rcu *filtered_pids;
/*
@@ -786,6 +793,17 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,
struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu);
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE */
+#if (defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)) && \
+ defined(CONFIG_FSNOTIFY)
+
+void latency_fsnotify(struct trace_array *tr);
+
+#else
+
+static void latency_fsnotify(struct trace_array *tr) { }
+
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
void __trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long flags, int skip,
int pc);
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index 862f4b0139fc..63526670605a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ static int get_sample(void)
/* If we exceed the threshold value, we have found a hardware latency */
if (sample > thresh || outer_sample > thresh) {
struct hwlat_sample s;
+ u64 latency;
ret = 1;
@@ -253,11 +254,13 @@ static int get_sample(void)
s.nmi_count = nmi_count;
trace_hwlat_sample(&s);
+ latency = max(sample, outer_sample);
+
/* Keep a running maximum ever recorded hardware latency */
- if (sample > tr->max_latency)
- tr->max_latency = sample;
- if (outer_sample > tr->max_latency)
- tr->max_latency = outer_sample;
+ if (latency > tr->max_latency) {
+ tr->max_latency = latency;
+ latency_fsnotify(tr);
+ }
}
out:
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists