linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191114190843.GB4664@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:43 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phh@....me,
        b.galvani@...il.com, stefan@...er.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:

> > > Well, it is not just guessing, it is there in the url I referenced. But
> > > I would of course prefer a better source. At first I wanted to spread
> > > my findings.  

> > The URL you provided looked to be for a different part though?

> No, they just skip the rc5t in the name. Same situation in the vendor
> kernel for my device, but there is only a tarball online, so it is bad
> to reference. Everything is named there ricoh619 (or 61x). And on the chip is
> printed rc5t619.

Ah, OK - that's probably good enough then.  Let's leave it a bit and see
if we can get some more definite review though.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)