[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114191538.GC171963@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:15:38 -0800
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Adrian Reber <areber@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <ovzxemul@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Radostin Stoyanov <rstoyanov1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
...
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> index 1d500ed03c63..2e649cfa07f4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
...
> @@ -174,24 +186,51 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> pid->level = ns->level;
>
> for (i = ns->level; i >= 0; i--) {
> - int pid_min = 1;
> + int tid = 0;
> +
> + if (set_tid_size) {
> + tid = set_tid[ns->level - i];
> + if (tid < 1 || tid >= pid_max)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
do we need to release pids what have been allocated on previous levels?
nr = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
Could you add a test for this case?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists