[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115203906.fbo6t7d2n6xk3saw@linux-p48b>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:39:06 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com,
bristot@...hat.com, longman@...hat.com, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] locking/percpu-rwsem, lockdep: Make percpu-rwsem use
its own lockdep_map
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>@@ -37,7 +48,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read(stru
> {
> might_sleep();
>
>- rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>+ rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
Unrelated to this patch, but we also need a might_sleep() annotation
in percpu_down_write().
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists