lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115154456.244c27e4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:56 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the devicetree tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the pwm tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-stm32.txt

between commit:

  56fb34d86e87 ("dt-bindings: mfd: Convert stm32 timers bindings to json-schema")

from the devicetree tree and commit:

  4205e356285e ("dt-bindings: pwm-stm32: Document pinctrl sleep state")

from the pwm tree.

I fixed it up (I just deleted the file - more fixup is probably required)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ