[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOZdJXXHK9U_Y7_VgVmuOFKDAh4OqBJ7hZx58hisZZ6Cz6xE2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:50:21 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/47] soc: fsl: qe: qe.c: guard use of
pvr_version_is() with CONFIG_PPC32
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:04 AM Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
> +static bool qe_general4_errata(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> + return pvr_version_is(PVR_VER_836x) || pvr_version_is(PVR_VER_832x);
> +#endif
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /* Program the BRG to the given sampling rate and multiplier
> *
> * @brg: the BRG, QE_BRG1 - QE_BRG16
> @@ -223,7 +231,7 @@ int qe_setbrg(enum qe_clock brg, unsigned int rate, unsigned int multiplier)
> /* Errata QE_General4, which affects some MPC832x and MPC836x SOCs, says
> that the BRG divisor must be even if you're not using divide-by-16
> mode. */
Can you also move this comment (and fix the comment formatting so that
it's a proper function comment) to qe_general4_errata()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists