[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115162609.2d26d498@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:26:09 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
rafael@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, mchehab+samsung@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, tytso@....edu, jmorris@...ei.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
zhengbin13@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
chenxiang66@...ilicon.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] simple_recursive_removal()
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:18:20 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> OK... debugfs and tracefs definitely convert to that; so do, AFAICS,
> spufs and selinuxfs, and I wouldn't be surprised if it could be
> used in a few more places... securityfs, almost certainly qibfs,
> gadgetfs looks like it could make use of that. Maybe subrpc
> as well, but I'll need to look in details. configfs won't,
> unfortunately...
Thanks Al for looking into this.
I'll try to test it in tracefs, and see if anything breaks. But
probably wont get to it till next week.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists