[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXGFBcfdpzt+xznH1jqPfnL2KXG5eeCwz114ohgriT6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:23:02 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Yu Chen <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jun Li <lijun.kernel@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] usb: roles: Add usb role switch notifier.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:11 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 22-10-2019 07:58, John Stultz wrote:
> > I'm fine to
> > continue digging and working on this approach, but I also don't want
> > to have to pollute the core code too much for this oddball hardware
> > (esp since doing the vbus control in the role-switch intermediary does
> > work ok - or at least better then this approach so far).
>
> Given the special nature of the hardware I'm fine with the OTG intermediary
> approach here. IMHO it is fine to just stick with that and to not spend
> too much time on this.
Ok. That was what I was leaning towards as well.
Thanks again for all the review and feedback here! I really appreciate it!
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists