lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115002807.GN6219@magnolia>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:28:07 -0800
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/fs: Move swap_[de]activate() to
 file_operations

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:19:43PM -0800, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> 
> Update the documentation for the move of the swap_* functions out of
> address_space_operations and into file_operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>

Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

--D

> ---
> Follow on to the V2 series sent earlier.  If I need to spin a V3 I will squash
> this into patch 2/2 "fs: Move swap_[de]activate to file_operations"
> 
>  Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> index 7d4d09dd5e6d..03a740d7faa4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> @@ -731,8 +731,6 @@ cache in your filesystem.  The following members are defined:
>  					      unsigned long);
>  		void (*is_dirty_writeback) (struct page *, bool *, bool *);
>  		int (*error_remove_page) (struct mapping *mapping, struct page *page);
> -		int (*swap_activate)(struct file *);
> -		int (*swap_deactivate)(struct file *);
>  	};
>  
>  ``writepage``
> @@ -924,16 +922,6 @@ cache in your filesystem.  The following members are defined:
>  	Setting this implies you deal with pages going away under you,
>  	unless you have them locked or reference counts increased.
>  
> -``swap_activate``
> -	Called when swapon is used on a file to allocate space if
> -	necessary and pin the block lookup information in memory.  A
> -	return value of zero indicates success, in which case this file
> -	can be used to back swapspace.
> -
> -``swap_deactivate``
> -	Called during swapoff on files where swap_activate was
> -	successful.
> -
>  
>  The File Object
>  ===============
> @@ -988,6 +976,8 @@ This describes how the VFS can manipulate an open file.  As of kernel
>  					   struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
>  					   loff_t len, unsigned int remap_flags);
>  		int (*fadvise)(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
> +		int (*swap_activate)(struct file *);
> +		int (*swap_deactivate)(struct file *);
>  	};
>  
>  Again, all methods are called without any locks being held, unless
> @@ -1108,6 +1098,16 @@ otherwise noted.
>  ``fadvise``
>  	possibly called by the fadvise64() system call.
>  
> +``swap_activate``
> +	Called when swapon is used on a file to allocate space if
> +	necessary and pin the block lookup information in memory.  A
> +	return value of zero indicates success, in which case this file
> +	can be used to back swapspace.
> +
> +``swap_deactivate``
> +	Called during swapoff on files where swap_activate was
> +	successful.
> +
>  Note that the file operations are implemented by the specific
>  filesystem in which the inode resides.  When opening a device node
>  (character or block special) most filesystems will call special
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ