[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jmQEKip=7530mTSzeY_bRSyJv_Y7B49AJuLiDaTjJqSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:09:06 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/acpi: Drop duplicate BOOT table initialization
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 6:06 AM Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> ACPI BOOT table is initialized in both acpi_boot_table_init &
> acpi_boot_init of setup_arch, but its usage is quite late at the end of
> start_kernel. It should be safe to drop one of them. Since it is less
> related with table init, drop it from there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Please resend with a CC to linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> It existed since git repo is built, so it might has its reason? The
> patch is not tested since I don't have BOOT table in my firmware.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 04205ce127a1..ca1c15bb0b48 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -1558,8 +1558,6 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> return;
> }
>
> - acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf);
> -
> /*
> * blacklist may disable ACPI entirely
> */
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists