[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115092424.17356-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:24:24 +0800
From: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<hpa@...or.com>, Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] x86/acpi: Drop duplicate BOOT table initialization
From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
ACPI BOOT table is initialized in both acpi_boot_table_init &
acpi_boot_init of setup_arch, but its usage is quite late at the end of
start_kernel. It should be safe to drop one of them. Since it is less
related with table init, drop it from there.
Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
It existed since git repo is built, so it might has its reason? The
patch is not tested since I don't have BOOT table in my firmware.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 04205ce127a1..ca1c15bb0b48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1558,8 +1558,6 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
return;
}
- acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf);
-
/*
* blacklist may disable ACPI entirely
*/
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists