linux-kernel - [PATCH v4] remoteproc: stm32: fix probe error case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1573812188-19842-1-git-send-email-fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:03:08 +0100
From:   Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
To:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] remoteproc: stm32: fix probe error case

If the rproc driver is probed before the mailbox driver and if the rproc
Device Tree node has some mailbox properties, the rproc driver probe
shall be deferred instead of being probed without mailbox support.

Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
---
Changes since v3: on error, free mailboxes from stm32_rproc_request_mbox()
Changes since v2: free other requested mailboxes after one request fails
Changes since v1: test IS_ERR() before checking PTR_ERR()
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 2cf4b29..bcebb78 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -310,11 +310,12 @@ static const struct stm32_mbox stm32_rproc_mbox[MBOX_NB_MBX] = {
 	}
 };
 
-static void stm32_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	unsigned int i;
+	int j;
 	const unsigned char *name;
 	struct mbox_client *cl;
 
@@ -329,10 +330,20 @@ static void stm32_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 		ddata->mb[i].chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, name);
 		if (IS_ERR(ddata->mb[i].chan)) {
+			if (PTR_ERR(ddata->mb[i].chan) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+				goto err_probe;
 			dev_warn(dev, "cannot get %s mbox\n", name);
 			ddata->mb[i].chan = NULL;
 		}
 	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_probe:
+	for (j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--)
+		if (ddata->mb[j].chan)
+			mbox_free_channel(ddata->mb[j].chan);
+	return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 }
 
 static int stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(struct rproc *rproc, bool hold)
@@ -596,7 +607,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
-	stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+	ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_rproc;
 
 	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.7.4