[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41765275-dbd5-406e-8ba1-bd0f92b737ee@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:42:33 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 36/36] soc: fsl: qe: remove PPC32 dependency from
CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE
On 15/11/2019 14.31, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
Hello kbuild
Thanks for your reports, but this has already been fixed. Is there some
way to indicate to the kbuild bot that it should stop using resources on
a specific patch set? There's really no point in the bot doing lots of
builds and sending out reports for a series that has already been
superseded - and reviewers might easily think that the report concerns
the latest revision. Perhaps something like
kbuild-ignore: <msg id of cover letter of revision N-1>
in the cover-letter of revision N? Or is there some smarter (automatic)
way of doing this?
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists