[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1573825602.4956.11.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:46:42 +0800
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
<rnayak@...eaurora.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...roid.com>, <saravanak@...gle.com>,
<salyzyn@...gle.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] scsi: ufs: Fix up auto hibern8 enablement
Hi Can,
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 20:27 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Stanley,
>
> Actually, I thought about the way you reommand.
>
> But I guess the author's intention here is to update the AH8 timer
> only when current runtime status is RPM_ACTIVE. If it is not RPM_ACTIVE,
> we just update the hba->ahit and bail out, because the AH8 timer will be
> updated in ufshcd_reusme() eventually when hba is resumed. This can
> avoid
> frequently waking up hba just for accessing a single register.
> How do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.
>
>
Agree with you.
Thanks :)
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists