[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115141657.GD41572@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:16:58 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
> > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack
> > to protect against return address overwrites. More information
>
> Will, Catalin, Mark,
>
> What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been
> addressed.
I'm hoping to look over the remaining bits in the next week or so, and
to throw my test boxes at this shortly.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists