[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05ba4e29fb78885cf9abf7bfc87e0a7bcda099fe.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:09:17 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: whitelist Originally-by: signature
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 16:02 +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> Oftentimes [1], the contributor would like to honor or give credits [2]
> to somebody's original ideas in the submission/reviewing process. While
> "Co-developed-by:" and "Suggested-by:" (currently whitelisted) could be
> employed for this purpose, they are not ideal.
You need to get the use of this accepted into Documentation/process
before adding it to checkpatch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists