lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <893d3caf85cd4ed0921fab84cfe28cad@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:51:24 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Shile Zhang' <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC:     "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] x86/unwind/orc: remove run-time ORC unwind
 tables sort

From: Shile Zhang
> Sent: 15 November 2019 06:48
...
>  arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> index 332ae6530fa8..280da6fa9922 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> @@ -273,9 +273,11 @@ void __init unwind_init(void)
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Sort the .orc_unwind and .orc_unwind_ip tables: */
> -	sort(__start_orc_unwind_ip, num_entries, sizeof(int), orc_sort_cmp,
> -	     orc_sort_swap);
> +	/*
> +	 * Note, orc_unwind and orc_unwind_ip tables has been sorted in
> +	 * vmlinux link phase by sorttable tool at build time.
> +	 * Its ready for binary search now.
> +	 */

How fast is sort() if the table is sorted?
Relying on the kernel sources and build scripts always being in sync seems dangerous.
Probably better to leave the sort in for a release of two.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ