linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 178/237] mm: handle no memcg case in memcg_kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:40:13 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 178/237] mm: handle no memcg case in memcg_kmem_charge() properly

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>

[ Upstream commit e68599a3c3ad0f3171a7cb4e48aa6f9a69381902 ]

Mike Galbraith reported a regression caused by the commit 9b6f7e163cd0
("mm: rework memcg kernel stack accounting") on a system with
"cgroup_disable=memory" boot option: the system panics with the following
stack trace:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000f8
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.19.0-preempt+ #410
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20180531_142017-buildhw-08.phx2.fed4
  RIP: 0010:page_counter_try_charge+0x22/0xc0
  Code: 41 5d c3 c3 0f 1f 40 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 ff 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 41 56 48 89 f8 49 89 fe 49
  Call Trace:
   try_charge+0xcb/0x780
   memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x28/0x80
   memcg_kmem_charge+0x8b/0x1d0
   copy_process.part.41+0x1ca/0x2070
   _do_fork+0xd7/0x3d0
   do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x180
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

The problem occurs because get_mem_cgroup_from_current() returns the NULL
pointer if memory controller is disabled.  Let's check if this is a case
at the beginning of memcg_kmem_charge() and just return 0 if
mem_cgroup_disabled() returns true.  This is how we handle this case in
many other places in the memory controller code.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181029215123.17830-1-guro@fb.com
Fixes: 9b6f7e163cd0 ("mm: rework memcg kernel stack accounting")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e0f7b94a4e9bc..b3220d2102461 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ int memcg_kmem_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order)
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (memcg_kmem_bypass())
+	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || memcg_kmem_bypass())
 		return 0;
 
 	memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_current();
-- 
2.20.1