lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:03:12 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mcroce@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com,
        andy@...yhouse.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: symmetric ICMP transmit

From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:10:37 +0100

> A bonding with layer2+3 or layer3+4 hashing uses the IP addresses and the ports
> to balance packets between slaves. With some network errors, we receive an ICMP
> error packet by the remote host or a router. If sent by a router, the source IP
> can differ from the remote host one. Additionally the ICMP protocol has no port
> numbers, so a layer3+4 bonding will get a different hash than the previous one.
> These two conditions could let the packet go through a different interface than
> the other packets of the same flow:
 ...
> An ICMP error packet contains the header of the packet which caused the network
> error, so inspect it and match the flow against it, so we can send the ICMP via
> the same interface of the previous packet in the flow.
> Move the IP and port dissect code into a generic function bond_flow_ip() and if
> we are dissecting an ICMP error packet, call it again with the adjusted offset.
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ